On the morning of March 12, 2026, Amina Bibi brought her eighteen-month-old son to the Civil Hospital in Karachi. The boy weighed nine kilograms — half what he should. His arms were the width of her thumb. The doctor examined him for less than three minutes and wrote a prescription for therapeutic milk. The hospital pharmacy had none. It had been out of stock for six weeks.
Bibi left the hospital and walked eleven blocks to a private pharmacy. The milk cost 4,200 rupees — roughly $15. Her husband, a day laborer at Karachi Port, earns 18,000 rupees a month when there is work. That month, there had been work for nine days. She bought one tin. It would last a week if she diluted it.
Four kilometers away, at Karachi Port's West Wharf, a Chinese-built gantry crane was unloading containers from a ship registered in Shenzhen. The crane was financed through the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, a $62 billion infrastructure program launched in 2015. Pakistan is now paying the interest on that debt — $3.8 billion annually, according to the country's 2025–2026 budget documents. The federal health budget for the same year is $1.2 billion.
This figure exceeds the combined federal budgets for health, education infrastructure, and rural water supply. It represents 23% of all federal tax revenue.
The Terms Beijing Didn't Publish
When Chinese President Xi Jinping and Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif signed the CPEC framework agreement in April 2015, the terms were not made public. Pakistan's parliament was not asked to ratify the deal. Over the following decade, China financed highways, power plants, railways, and port upgrades across Pakistan, from Gwadar on the Arabian Sea to the Khunjerab Pass on the Chinese border.
In 2021, a leaked cache of documents obtained by the Center for Global Development revealed the loan structures. Most CPEC projects were financed not as grants or concessional loans, but as commercial loans at interest rates between 5% and 6.5%, with repayment periods of fifteen to twenty years. Some power projects included sovereign guarantees requiring Pakistan to compensate Chinese firms for any revenue shortfall — in dollars.
DEBT STRUCTURE REVEALED
Analysis of fourteen major CPEC energy projects shows guaranteed returns to Chinese investors of 17% to 20% in dollar terms, with shortfalls covered by Pakistan's federal budget. The Sahiwal coal plant alone cost Pakistan $1.9 billion more than projected due to currency depreciation and capacity payment guarantees.
Source: Center for Global Development, Hidden Debt Report, March 2022By 2023, Pakistan's total external debt had reached $126 billion, nearly half of it owed to China. The country entered a bailout agreement with the International Monetary Fund that year — its twenty-third IMF program since 1958. The IMF's conditions included cutting subsidies, raising energy prices, and devaluing the rupee. Inflation reached 38% in May 2023. The price of wheat flour doubled. Malnutrition rates among children under five climbed from 40.2% in 2018 to 47.6% in 2025, according to Pakistan's National Nutrition Survey.
Gwadar: The Port That Belongs to Beijing
The centerpiece of CPEC is Gwadar Port, a deepwater facility on Pakistan's southwestern coast, 450 kilometers from the Strait of Hormuz. Under a 2013 agreement, China Overseas Port Holding Company was granted operational control of the port for forty years, with 91% of revenues going to the Chinese operator and 9% to Pakistan.
China has invested $1.6 billion in Gwadar's infrastructure since 2015. But the port has failed to generate expected traffic. In 2025, it handled 1.2 million tons of cargo — less than 3% of Karachi Port's throughput. Meanwhile, Gwadar's residents have seen electricity supply decline, water scarcity worsen, and fishing stocks collapse as trawlers from Karachi and China operate in waters that were previously artisanal fishing grounds.
Balochistan, the province where Gwadar is located, has been fighting a low-intensity insurgency since 2004. The Baloch Liberation Army and other separatist groups describe CPEC as a colonial project that extracts resources while displacing local populations. Between January 2021 and March 2026, the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project recorded 743 violent incidents linked to the Balochistan insurgency, resulting in 1,834 deaths. At least forty-seven attacks targeted Chinese workers or CPEC infrastructure.
GWADAR REVENUE FAILURE
Gwadar Port generated $22 million in revenue in fiscal year 2024–2025. After the 91% operator share, Pakistan received $1.98 million — less than the annual cost of security deployment to protect the port, which exceeds $40 million according to Pakistan's Ministry of Interior budget documents.
Source: Pakistan Ministry of Maritime Affairs, Annual Report 2024–2025Don't miss the next investigation.
Get The Editorial's morning briefing — deeply researched stories, no ads, no paywalls, straight to your inbox.
The Water War That Never Ended
CPEC's mounting costs have intensified a parallel crisis: water. Pakistan and India are bound by the Indus Waters Treaty, signed in 1960 and brokered by the World Bank. The treaty allocates the three western rivers — the Indus, Jhelum, and Chenab — to Pakistan, and the three eastern rivers to India. For sixty-six years, the treaty survived three wars and countless skirmishes.
But since 2016, India has accelerated construction of run-of-river hydroelectric projects on the Chenab and Jhelum, including the 850-megawatt Ratle Dam and the 1,000-megawatt Pakal Dul Dam. Pakistan argues these projects violate the treaty by enabling India to control river flows during critical planting and harvest seasons. India maintains the projects are permissible under the treaty's provisions for non-consumptive use.
In February 2023, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi inaugurated the 624-megawatt Kiru Dam in Jammu and Kashmir. At the ceremony, he described water as a strategic asset. Within a week, Pakistan's Ministry of Water Resources filed its seventh formal objection under the treaty's dispute resolution mechanism. The World Bank declined to establish a Court of Arbitration, citing procedural disagreements between the two countries.
Formal objections under the treaty's dispute mechanism
| Project Name | River | Capacity (MW) | Objection Filed | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kishanganga | Jhelum | 330 | May 2016 | Arbitration ruled partially for Pakistan |
| Ratle | Chenab | 850 | October 2016 | Unresolved |
| Pakal Dul | Chenab | 1,000 | March 2018 | Unresolved |
| Kiru | Chenab | 624 | February 2023 | Unresolved |
| Kwar | Chenab | 540 | August 2024 | Unresolved |
Source: Pakistan Ministry of Water Resources, Treaty Compliance Reports 2016–2026
Pakistan's agricultural sector depends on the Indus River system for 90% of its irrigation. The country is now classified as water-stressed, with annual per capita availability dropping from 5,260 cubic meters in 1951 to 908 cubic meters in 2025 — below the international water scarcity threshold of 1,000 cubic meters. Climate change has worsened the crisis: glacial melt in the Himalayas, which feeds the Indus system, has accelerated by 65% since 2000, according to the International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development.
The Taliban Next Door
Pakistan's security establishment spent decades cultivating the Afghan Taliban as a strategic asset against India. After the Taliban seized Kabul in August 2021, Pakistan was one of the few governments to maintain formal diplomatic relations with the new regime. But the alliance has frayed.
The Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan, known as TTP, is a militant group that seeks to overthrow the Pakistani state and impose Sharia law. It was weakened by Pakistani military operations between 2014 and 2018, with many of its fighters fleeing to Afghanistan. After the Taliban returned to power in Kabul, the TTP reconstituted itself. The group now operates from sanctuaries in Afghanistan's Kunar, Khost, and Nangarhar provinces, launching cross-border raids into Pakistan's Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan provinces.
In 2025, the TTP carried out 347 attacks inside Pakistan, killing 612 people, including 214 security personnel, according to the Pak Institute for Peace Studies. That represents a 73% increase over 2023. Pakistan has repeatedly demanded that the Taliban government in Kabul dismantle TTP sanctuaries. The Taliban has refused, citing ethnic and ideological ties.
In September 2025, Pakistan launched airstrikes against alleged TTP positions inside Afghanistan — the first such strikes since the Taliban takeover. The Afghan Taliban retaliated by closing the Torkham and Chaman border crossings for three weeks, cutting off the main trade routes between the two countries. Pakistan lost an estimated $270 million in trade revenue. The crossings reopened only after Chinese mediation.
The Nuclear Equation No One Discusses
Both India and Pakistan possess nuclear arsenals of approximately 170 warheads each, according to the Federation of American Scientists' 2026 assessment. Unlike the superpowers during the Cold War, they share a 2,900-kilometer border and have fought four wars since 1947. The flight time for a ballistic missile between Islamabad and New Delhi is less than four minutes.
The two countries have no direct communication hotline, no nuclear risk reduction centers, and no agreement on pre-launch notifications. After the February 2019 Balakot crisis — in which India launched airstrikes inside Pakistan and Pakistan shot down an Indian fighter jet — both sides mobilized their nuclear forces. The crisis de-escalated only after intervention by the United States, China, and Saudi Arabia.
NUCLEAR PROXIMITY RISK
Modeling by Princeton University's Science and Global Security Program estimates that a limited nuclear exchange between India and Pakistan — defined as 100 warheads of 15-kiloton yield — would kill 50 to 125 million people directly and trigger global cooling of 2 to 5 degrees Celsius due to smoke injection into the stratosphere, causing crop failures across Asia, Africa, and Europe.
Source: Science and Global Security Program, Princeton University, September 2022Pakistan's nuclear doctrine is based on what it calls Full Spectrum Deterrence — the threat to use nuclear weapons, including tactical battlefield weapons, in response to a conventional Indian military offensive. India, which maintains a larger conventional military, has adopted a Cold Start doctrine that envisions rapid, limited strikes into Pakistani territory before international intervention. The combination creates what arms control experts describe as a hair-trigger dynamic.
Neither country has signed the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. Neither has ratified the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty. There is no bilateral arms control agreement. The only existing mechanism is a 1988 accord requiring each country to provide the other with a list of nuclear installations that are not to be attacked — an agreement that presumes war, not its prevention.
What Happens When the Money Runs Out
On April 15, 2026, Pakistan's Ministry of Finance published its quarterly debt report. The country's external debt servicing for the fiscal year 2025–2026 will total $25.6 billion — more than the combined value of exports and remittances. To meet the payments, Pakistan has drawn down its foreign exchange reserves to $6.8 billion, enough to cover five weeks of imports.
China has agreed to roll over $4.3 billion in CPEC-related debt coming due in 2026, but only at a refinancing rate of 4.8% — higher than the original terms. The IMF's extended fund facility, approved in July 2025, requires Pakistan to increase tax revenues by 40% over three years, eliminate energy subsidies, and privatize thirteen state-owned enterprises, including Pakistan International Airlines and the state electricity distribution companies.
The austerity measures have triggered sporadic protests in Karachi, Lahore, and Rawalpindi. In March 2026, police fired tear gas at demonstrators outside the Karachi Press Club who were protesting electricity tariffs that have risen 127% since 2022. Fourteen people were injured. No one was arrested.
Amina Bibi does not follow the debt statistics or the geopolitical maneuvering. She knows that her son is sick, that the medicine costs more than her family earns, and that the hospital has no supplies. On April 22, she brought him back to Civil Hospital. He weighed 8.6 kilograms. The doctor told her the boy needed to be admitted to the malnutrition ward. There were no beds available. She was given a date for three weeks later.
At Karachi Port, the gantry crane continued unloading containers. The port operates twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week. The debt service on the infrastructure that built it comes due quarterly, in dollars, without fail.
Join the conversation
What do you think? Share your reaction and discuss this story with others.
