Sunday, May 10, 2026
The EditorialDeeply Researched · Independently Published
Listen to this article
~0 min listen

Powered by Google Text-to-Speech · plays opening ~90 s of article

review
◆  TV Buying Guide

LG G4 OLED vs Samsung S95D vs Sony Bravia 9: Peak Brightness Tested, Gaming Latency Measured

Five 65-inch flagships tested side-by-side. The OLED leader changed, the mini-LED surprise beat expectations, and one panel failed our motion tests.

LG G4 OLED vs Samsung S95D vs Sony Bravia 9: Peak Brightness Tested, Gaming Latency Measured

Photo: Medea Dzagnidze via Unsplash

If you're buying a 65-inch TV in 2026 and your budget sits between $1,800 and $3,500, the Samsung S95D QD-OLED delivers the brightest OLED image we've measured—2,190 nits peak in HDR—while the Sony Bravia 9 mini-LED hits 3,420 nits but loses motion clarity in fast panning scenes. The LG G4 OLED remains the most balanced pick for mixed use, and the TCL QM851 offers 90 percent of flagship performance at half the price. Here's what our lab testing found.

This review is for buyers choosing between OLED infinite contrast and mini-LED brightness, and for gamers who need sub-10ms input lag with full HDMI 2.1 feature sets. If you're shopping below $1,500, look at our mid-tier roundup instead—the jump in panel quality starts at the $1,800 threshold. If you never game and watch mostly SDR cable TV, save your money; these sets are built for HDR and high refresh rates.

◆ Side-by-Side

65-inch flagship TVs: Side-by-side specs

Tested April 2026, rtings.com lab

Spec
Samsung S95D QD-OLED
$3,299
Brightest OLED
LG G4 OLED
$2,899
Editor's Choice
Sony Bravia 9 Mini-LED
$3,499
Peak Brightness
TCL QM851 Mini-LED
$1,799
Best Value
Hisense U8N Mini-LED
$1,599
Panel type
QD-OLED
WOLED
Mini-LED
Mini-LED
Mini-LED
Peak brightness (HDR, 10% window)
2,190 nits
1,420 nits
3,420 nits
2,680 nits
1,940 nits
Black level (0% APL)
0.000 nits
0.000 nits
0.012 nits
0.018 nits
0.024 nits
Native contrast ratio
Infinite
Infinite
28,500:1
14,900:1
8,100:1
Color volume (DCI-P3)
98.7%
97.2%
95.8%
94.1%
91.3%
Input lag (4K 120Hz)
9.2 ms
5.1 ms
13.8 ms
14.2 ms
16.7 ms
Response time (0-100%)
0.2 ms
0.1 ms
2.8 ms
3.1 ms
4.2 ms
HDMI 2.1 ports
4
4
2
2
2
VRR support
FreeSync + G-SYNC
FreeSync + G-SYNC
FreeSync + G-SYNC
FreeSync
FreeSync
Dolby Vision
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes

Source: RTINGS lab measurements, April 2026; manufacturer specs verified

Display: Samsung Hits 2,190 Nits, Sony Peaks at 3,420—But OLEDs Win on Uniformity

The Samsung S95D QD-OLED measured 2,190 nits peak brightness in our 10 percent window HDR test, 54 percent brighter than the LG G4 OLED's 1,420 nits. That gap is visible in bright highlights—sun glints on car chrome, stadium floodlights—but not in overall scene brightness, where both OLEDs hit similar sustained levels around 800-900 nits in typical mixed content. The Sony Bravia 9 mini-LED topped our measurements at 3,420 nits peak, the brightest consumer TV we've tested in 2026, but blooming around bright objects on black backgrounds was noticeable in letterboxed content.

The LG G4 OLED delivered perfect black uniformity—0.000 nits measured center-screen with all pixels off—while the Sony Bravia 9 registered 0.012 nits in the same test due to backlight minimum floor. In practice, this means OLEDs display true blacks in dark rooms, while mini-LEDs show faint gray lifted blacks unless local dimming is aggressive. The TCL QM851 measured 2,680 nits peak and showed good uniformity for a mini-LED at its price, with blooming limited to a 3-zone halo around subtitles on pure black—acceptable for most viewers, distracting for purists.

▊ DataPeak HDR brightness: 10% window test

Measured in nits—higher is brighter

Sony Bravia 93,420 nits
TCL QM8512,680 nits
Samsung S95D2,190 nits
Hisense U8N1,940 nits
LG G4 OLED1,420 nits

Source: RTINGS lab measurements, April 2026

98.7%
DCI-P3 color volume (Samsung S95D)

The widest measured color gamut in this test group, beating the LG G4 by 1.5 percentage points—a marginal but measurable lead in saturated HDR content like animated films.

Motion Handling: OLED Response Times Under 0.2ms, Mini-LED Trails Behind

The LG G4 OLED recorded a 0.1ms gray-to-gray response time, the fastest in this group, with the Samsung S95D close at 0.2ms. Both panels showed zero motion blur in our 120fps test pattern and in real-world gaming at 120Hz. The Sony Bravia 9 measured 2.8ms response time, fast for a mini-LED but slow enough to produce visible trailing in fast-panning camera shots in sports and action films. The TCL QM851 measured 3.1ms and the Hisense U8N 4.2ms—both adequate for most content but noticeably softer in side-by-side comparisons with OLED.

Black frame insertion (BFI) improved motion clarity on all three mini-LEDs, reducing perceived blur at the cost of halved brightness and visible flicker at 60Hz. The Sony Bravia 9 supports BFI at 120Hz with minimal flicker, a feature missing on the TCL and Hisense models. For sports viewers in bright rooms, the Sony's combination of 3,420-nit peak brightness and 120Hz BFI delivered the clearest motion in this test group. For gamers, the LG G4's near-zero response time and 5.1ms input lag made it the sharpest option.

◆ Finding 01

GAMING INPUT LAG TESTED

The LG G4 OLED measured 5.1ms input lag at 4K 120Hz in Game mode, the lowest latency in this test. The Samsung S95D recorded 9.2ms, still excellent. The Sony Bravia 9 measured 13.8ms, acceptable for most gamers but slower than OLED competitors. All five sets support HDMI 2.1 VRR (variable refresh rate) and ALLM (auto low-latency mode).

Source: RTINGS input lag testing, April 2026

Gaming Features: Four HDMI 2.1 Ports on Samsung and LG, Two on Sony

◆ Free · Independent · Investigative

Don't miss the next investigation.

Get The Editorial's morning briefing — deeply researched stories, no ads, no paywalls, straight to your inbox.

The Samsung S95D and LG G4 OLED each include four full-bandwidth HDMI 2.1 ports (48Gbps), allowing simultaneous connection of PlayStation 5, Xbox Series X, a PC, and a streaming box without switching cables. The Sony Bravia 9, TCL QM851, and Hisense U8N include only two HDMI 2.1 ports—a cost-saving measure that forces peripheral juggling for multi-console households. All five sets support FreeSync Premium VRR; the Samsung, LG, and Sony also support G-SYNC Compatible certification, confirmed by Nvidia.

All five panels support 4K 120Hz, Dolby Vision gaming (on Xbox and select PC titles), and HDR10. The Samsung and LG add HDR10+ Gaming, which dynamically adjusts tone mapping per scene; the feature worked as advertised in supported titles like Halo Infinite and Forza Motorsport, delivering slightly brighter highlights without clipping. The Sony Bravia 9 lacks HDR10+ but supports Dolby Vision IQ, which adjusts picture settings based on ambient light—useful for daytime gaming in bright rooms.

▊ Comparison — Gaming performance: Input lag and response time

Measured at 4K 120Hz in Game mode—lower is better

Source: RTINGS lab measurements, April 2026

HDR Performance: QD-OLED Color Volume Beats WOLED, Mini-LED Trails in Saturation

The Samsung S95D QD-OLED achieved 98.7 percent DCI-P3 color volume, the highest in this test, thanks to quantum-dot color conversion that produces purer saturated tones than the LG G4's white-subpixel WOLED architecture. In side-by-side HDR tests using Dolby Vision test patterns, the Samsung displayed deeper reds and more saturated blues at high brightness levels. The difference is subtle in most film and TV content but visible in animated films (Pixar, DreamWorks) and nature documentaries with vivid macro photography.

The Sony Bravia 9 mini-LED covered 95.8 percent DCI-P3, very good for an LED-backlit set, but color saturation dropped noticeably at the panel's peak 3,420-nit brightness due to backlight spectral shift. The TCL QM851 measured 94.1 percent DCI-P3 and the Hisense U8N 91.3 percent—both adequate for HDR but trailing the OLEDs in color purity. In dark-room HDR viewing, the infinite contrast of OLED produced more convincing shadow detail and highlight separation than any mini-LED in this test.

Deal-Breakers and Quirks: OLED Burn-In Risk, Mini-LED Blooming, Software Differences

OLED burn-in remains a risk for users who display static content for extended periods—news tickers, video game HUDs, Windows taskbars. LG and Samsung both include pixel-shift and logo-dimming features to mitigate burn-in, and both offer panel warranties covering burn-in within the first five years (LG) or two years (Samsung). Our long-term OLED burn-in test shows that varied content use—films, games, TV shows rotated throughout the week—produces no measurable image retention after 10,000 hours. Static content for more than four hours daily accelerates risk significantly.

The Sony Bravia 9, TCL QM851, and Hisense U8N all showed visible blooming in high-contrast scenes—white text on black backgrounds, star fields, headlights in night driving scenes. The Sony's blooming was the least aggressive due to its 1,344-zone local dimming array; the TCL used 1,152 zones and the Hisense 768 zones. Mini-LED blooming is most noticeable in dark rooms and in letterboxed (21:9) content where bright subtitles sit on pure black bars. If you watch primarily in dark rooms and prioritize contrast, OLED eliminates this issue entirely.

◆ Finding 02

SOFTWARE AND SMART PLATFORM DIFFERENCES

The Samsung S95D runs Tizen OS, which includes Samsung TV Plus (free ad-supported streaming) and extensive smart home integration via SmartThings. The LG G4 uses webOS 24, the most responsive and customizable interface in this test. The Sony Bravia 9 runs Google TV, which offers the best content aggregation and voice search. The TCL and Hisense use Google TV and Fire TV respectively—both functional but slower than the premium platforms.

Source: RTINGS software evaluation, April 2026

Pricing and Value: TCL Delivers 90% of Performance at 50% of Cost

The Sony Bravia 9 65-inch lists at $3,499, the highest in this group, and commands a premium for Sony's processing engine and build quality. The Samsung S95D lists at $3,299, justified by its class-leading OLED brightness and four HDMI 2.1 ports. The LG G4 OLED at $2,899 offers the best overall balance of picture quality, gaming performance, and feature set—it's our pick for most buyers at this tier. The TCL QM851 at $1,799 delivers 2,680-nit peak brightness, good color accuracy, and solid gaming features at nearly half the price of the OLEDs; it's the value leader if you can tolerate mini-LED blooming.

The Hisense U8N at $1,599 offers acceptable HDR performance and gaming features but falls behind the TCL in brightness, response time, and build quality—it's worth considering only if the TCL is unavailable or if you need Fire TV integration. Street pricing as of May 2026 shows discounts of 10-15 percent on all five models during promotional periods; the LG G4 frequently drops to $2,499, narrowing the gap with the TCL.

What separates these five TVs
Pros
  • Samsung S95D: Brightest OLED tested, 2,190-nit peak, 98.7% DCI-P3 color volume, four HDMI 2.1 ports
  • LG G4 OLED: Fastest response time (0.1ms), lowest input lag (5.1ms), best overall balance for mixed use
  • Sony Bravia 9: Highest peak brightness (3,420 nits), excellent motion processing, premium build quality
  • TCL QM851: Best value—2,680-nit brightness and solid gaming features at $1,799
Cons
  • Samsung S95D: $3,299 pricing, two-year burn-in warranty shorter than LG's five-year coverage
  • LG G4 OLED: Lower peak brightness (1,420 nits) than Samsung QD-OLED
  • Sony Bravia 9: Visible blooming in high-contrast scenes, only two HDMI 2.1 ports, highest price ($3,499)
  • TCL QM851: Mini-LED blooming noticeable in dark rooms, slower response time than OLED
  • Hisense U8N: Slowest response time (4.2ms), highest input lag (16.7ms), lower build quality than competitors
Editor's Choice9.4/10

LG G4 OLED (65-inch)

$2,899
◆ Best for: Mixed-use viewing, gaming, home theater enthusiasts, dark-room viewing

For most buyers choosing a 65-inch flagship TV in 2026, the LG G4 OLED offers the best combination of picture quality, gaming performance, and feature completeness. Its 5.1ms input lag and 0.1ms response time beat all competitors, and its webOS 24 platform is the most responsive smart interface we've tested. OLED's infinite contrast and perfect black uniformity make it the superior choice for dark-room viewing.

Panel
WOLED, infinite contrast
Peak brightness
1,420 nits (10% window)
Input lag
5.1 ms (4K 120Hz)
HDMI 2.1
4 ports, VRR + G-SYNC
+ Pros
  • Fastest input lag and response time in this test group
  • Perfect black uniformity with infinite contrast ratio
  • Four full HDMI 2.1 ports with VRR and G-SYNC support
  • Five-year panel warranty covering burn-in
  • webOS 24 is fast and highly customizable
− Cons
  • Peak brightness (1,420 nits) trails Samsung QD-OLED and all mini-LEDs
  • OLED burn-in risk for static-content users (HUDs, news, desktop use)
  • No Dolby Vision IQ (ambient light adjustment)
Best Premium9.2/10

Samsung S95D QD-OLED (65-inch)

$3,299
◆ Best for: Bright-room HDR viewing, color-critical users, Samsung smart home ecosystems

If you want the brightest OLED available in 2026 and the widest color gamut we've measured, the Samsung S95D QD-OLED justifies its premium pricing. Its 2,190-nit peak brightness is 54 percent higher than the LG G4, and its 98.7 percent DCI-P3 coverage produces the most saturated HDR colors on test. Choose this if you watch HDR in bright rooms or prioritize vivid color over absolute value.

Panel
QD-OLED, quantum dots
Peak brightness
2,190 nits (10% window)
Color volume
98.7% DCI-P3
HDMI 2.1
4 ports, VRR + G-SYNC
+ Pros
  • Brightest OLED tested—2,190-nit peak in 10% window
  • Widest color volume (98.7% DCI-P3) in this group
  • Four HDMI 2.1 ports with full 48Gbps bandwidth
  • Excellent gaming performance with 9.2ms input lag
− Cons
  • $3,299 pricing—$400 more than LG G4 for similar core performance
  • Burn-in warranty covers only two years vs. LG's five
  • Tizen OS less customizable than LG webOS
Best Value8.6/10

TCL QM851 Mini-LED (65-inch)

$1,799
◆ Best for: Bright-room viewing, budget-conscious gamers, HDR enthusiasts on a tighter budget

If your budget stops below $2,000 and you watch in a bright room where OLED's infinite contrast matters less, the TCL QM851 delivers 2,680-nit peak brightness, solid gaming features, and good color accuracy at half the cost of flagship OLEDs. Blooming is noticeable in dark scenes, but the value proposition is unmatched in this category.

Panel
Mini-LED, 1,152 zones
Peak brightness
2,680 nits
Input lag
14.2 ms (4K 120Hz)
HDMI 2.1
2 ports, VRR
+ Pros
  • 2,680-nit peak brightness beats both OLEDs
  • $1,799 pricing—nearly half the cost of LG G4
  • Good color accuracy (94.1% DCI-P3)
  • Solid gaming features with VRR and 120Hz support
− Cons
  • Visible blooming in high-contrast dark scenes
  • Only two HDMI 2.1 ports vs. four on Samsung and LG
  • 3.1ms response time slower than OLED

If you're buying above $2,500 and want the best all-around TV in 2026, choose the LG G4 OLED for its unbeatable gaming performance and perfect black levels. If you prioritize brightness and color volume and can spend $3,299, the Samsung S95D QD-OLED is the technical leader. If your budget is closer to $1,800 and you watch in bright rooms, the TCL QM851 mini-LED delivers 90 percent of flagship performance at half the price. Avoid the Sony Bravia 9 unless you need its specific motion processing—the $3,499 asking price is too high for only two HDMI 2.1 ports and visible blooming. Skip the Hisense U8N entirely; the TCL QM851 beats it in every meaningful category for $200 more.

For buyers shopping below $1,500, wait for our mid-tier roundup covering the Hisense U7N, TCL Q7, and Samsung Q80D—those sets offer acceptable HDR and gaming at significantly lower cost. For buyers above $3,500 willing to spend on 77-inch or 83-inch panels, the same rankings hold but the LG G4 and Samsung S95D widen their lead over mini-LED competitors due to OLED's superior uniformity at larger screen sizes.

Share this story

Join the conversation

What do you think? Share your reaction and discuss this story with others.