North Korea has shipped an estimated 11,000 containers of artillery shells and ballistic missiles to Russia since September 2023, according to South Korean intelligence assessments released last month. In return, Pyongyang has received cash payments estimated at $1.7 billion, satellite reconnaissance technology, and Russian assistance with its struggling spy satellite programme. The arms deal represents the most significant military partnership between the two nations since the Cold War ended, and it has fundamentally altered the strategic calculus on the Korean Peninsula.
For the 46,000 South Korean workers who commute daily to factories within artillery range of the Demilitarized Zone, the implications are immediate. Park Min-ji, a 38-year-old quality control manager at a semiconductor plant in Paju, seven kilometres from the border, told reporters last week that her company had quietly begun moving sensitive production equipment southward. "They don't say it's because of the North," she said. "But everyone knows."
The weapons transfers, documented by satellite imagery analysed by the Center for Strategic and International Studies and confirmed by U.S. intelligence officials in Congressional testimony on March 12, have provided Russia with critical artillery ammunition for its war in Ukraine. But they have also funded North Korea's most ambitious nuclear modernisation in decades, and they have emboldened Kim Jong Un to adopt a nuclear doctrine that explicitly contemplates first use of atomic weapons if the regime perceives an imminent threat to its survival.
THE ARMS PIPELINE
Between September 2023 and March 2026, North Korea delivered approximately 11,000 shipping containers to Russia via the port of Najin and overland rail through Khasan. South Korean intelligence estimates the containers held 6.7 million artillery shells and at least 45 KN-23 short-range ballistic missiles, weapons systems that have been used against Ukrainian cities including Kharkiv and Zaporizhzhia.
Source: National Intelligence Service (South Korea), Monthly Assessment, March 2026Fifteen Years of Consolidation
When Kim Jong Un assumed power in December 2011 at age 27, Western intelligence agencies predicted instability. His father, Kim Jong Il, had ruled for 17 years; his grandfather, Kim Il Sung, for 46. The youngest Kim had spent fewer than three years being groomed for succession. Analysts expected a regency, a power struggle, perhaps a collapse.
Instead, Kim executed his uncle and regent, Jang Song-thaek, in December 2013, purging him for "treachery" and "attempting to overthrow the state." Jang, who had been photographed standing beside Kim at his father's funeral, was arrested during a Politburo meeting, tried within four days, and shot. South Korean intelligence later concluded that more than 140 officials connected to Jang were also executed or sent to labour camps.
Four years later, on February 13, 2017, Kim's half-brother Kim Jong-nam was killed at Kuala Lumpur International Airport by two women who smeared VX nerve agent on his face. Malaysian authorities arrested the women, who claimed they believed they were participating in a prank television show. Investigators found North Korean embassy officials had orchestrated the assassination. Kim Jong-nam had been living in exile in Macau under Chinese protection and had occasionally criticised the regime in interviews with Japanese journalists. His murder sent an unambiguous message: dissent, even from blood relatives, would not be tolerated.
Between 2012 and 2020, South Korea's Institute for National Security Strategy documented at least 340 executions of senior officials, including generals, ministers, and party cadres. The purges extended to the military: in 2015, Kim ordered the execution of Defence Minister Hyon Yong-chol with an anti-aircraft gun at a military school in Pyongyang, reportedly for falling asleep during a meeting and showing disrespect. By 2018, every member of the Politburo Presidium had been replaced at least once.
The Nuclear Acceleration
While consolidating political power, Kim accelerated North Korea's nuclear and missile programmes at a pace that stunned Western intelligence agencies. Between 2011 and 2017, North Korea conducted four nuclear tests, including a thermonuclear device tested on September 3, 2017, with an estimated yield of 250 kilotons—more than 16 times the power of the bomb dropped on Hiroshima.
Kim Jong Un's regime has launched more ballistic missiles than his father and grandfather combined, refining ICBM technology capable of reaching the continental United States.
On November 29, 2017, North Korea successfully tested the Hwasong-15 intercontinental ballistic missile, which reached an altitude of 4,475 kilometres and flew for 53 minutes before landing in the Sea of Japan. Analysis by the Missile Defense Project at CSIS concluded the missile, if fired on a standard trajectory, could reach Washington, D.C. Kim declared North Korea had achieved "the historic cause of perfecting the state nuclear force."
Diplomatic engagement followed. The 2018 summits with President Donald Trump in Singapore and Hanoi produced headlines but no agreement: North Korea demanded immediate sanctions relief; the United States insisted on complete denuclearisation. The talks collapsed in February 2019. Kim returned to Pyongyang and resumed missile testing.
By 2023, North Korea had successfully launched its first military reconnaissance satellite, Malligyong-1, on November 21 aboard a Chollima-1 rocket. The satellite is believed to have limited resolution capabilities—South Korean officials estimate it can distinguish objects larger than one metre—but it marked a significant technological leap. U.S. Space Command confirmed the satellite achieved orbit and was transmitting data.
Don't miss the next investigation.
Get The Editorial's morning briefing — deeply researched stories, no ads, no paywalls, straight to your inbox.
NUCLEAR STOCKPILE EXPANSION
As of January 2026, North Korea is estimated to possess between 50 and 70 nuclear warheads, with fissile material sufficient to produce 12 to 18 additional weapons annually. The stockpile has grown from an estimated 10-20 warheads in 2011. U.S. intelligence agencies assess that North Korea now has miniaturised warheads capable of fitting atop its Hwasong-15 and Hwasong-17 ICBMs.
Source: Arms Control Association and Federation of American Scientists, Nuclear Weapons Assessments 2026The Russia Deal
Russia's invasion of Ukraine on February 24, 2022, created an opportunity. By mid-2023, Russia was firing an estimated 10,000 artillery shells per day and running low on ammunition. North Korea had Soviet-era stockpiles of 152mm and 122mm shells compatible with Russian artillery systems, and it needed cash and technology.
Kim Jong Un travelled to Russia's Far East in September 2023, meeting President Vladimir Putin at the Vostochny Cosmodrome. Photographs released by Russian state media showed Kim examining Soyuz rockets and discussing space cooperation. U.S. officials believe the meeting finalised an arms-for-technology deal: North Korea would supply artillery shells, rockets, and ballistic missiles; Russia would provide satellite expertise, submarine technology, and hard currency.
Satellite imagery from October 2023 onward, analysed by Open Source Intelligence analysts and confirmed by South Korea's National Intelligence Service, showed a dramatic increase in rail traffic between North Korea and Russia. At least 74 trains crossed the border at Tumangang between October 2023 and February 2024, compared to virtually zero commercial traffic in previous years. Ships registered to North Korean and Russian front companies made at least 32 voyages between Najin and Russian Pacific ports during the same period.
The weapons have been used. Ukrainian prosecutors documented North Korean KN-23 missile debris recovered from strike sites in Kharkiv on January 2, 2024, and in Zaporizhzhia on February 7. Serial numbers on rocket motor casings matched production batches from North Korea's February 11 Factory. In March 2024, the U.S. Treasury Department sanctioned three Russian entities and one North Korean individual for facilitating the arms transfers, but the shipments continued.
First-Use Nuclear Doctrine
In September 2022, North Korea's Supreme People's Assembly passed a law enshrining the country's status as a nuclear weapons state and authorising preemptive nuclear strikes if the regime perceives an imminent attack on its leadership or nuclear command structure. The law states that nuclear weapons may be used "automatically and immediately" if command and control systems are threatened.
Kim Jong Un addressed the Assembly directly: "If any forces try to infringe upon the fundamental interests of our state, our nuclear forces will have to decisively accomplish its unexpected second mission." Analysts interpreted "second mission" as a reference to offensive, rather than purely retaliatory, use.
The doctrine represents a significant departure from previous North Korean nuclear posture, which emphasised deterrence and retaliation. In January 2024, Kim went further, stating in a speech to the Central Military Commission that North Korea would not hesitate to use nuclear weapons if its sovereignty were violated and that the United States and South Korea should not assume rationality would constrain Pyongyang's actions.
The KN-23 short-range ballistic missile, now in serial production, can reach the South Korean capital in under four minutes, leaving virtually no time for evacuation or meaningful civil defence response.
U.S. and South Korean officials have struggled to formulate a response. Extended deterrence commitments—the U.S. nuclear umbrella—are supposed to reassure Seoul that Washington would retaliate against any North Korean nuclear use. But the credibility of those commitments depends on an assumption of rational cost-benefit calculations by Pyongyang. A regime that has embraced first-use doctrine and demonstrated a willingness to escalate without warning challenges that assumption.
In February 2026, South Korean Defence Minister Kim Yong-hyun publicly called for Seoul to consider acquiring its own nuclear weapons, a statement that triggered immediate diplomatic backlash from Washington. The Biden administration reaffirmed the U.S. commitment to South Korea's defence but privately expressed alarm that the alliance's nuclear taboo might be eroding. South Korean public opinion polls show 72 percent support for indigenous nuclear weapons development, up from 54 percent in 2020.
A State Built for Escalation
Fifteen years into Kim Jong Un's rule, North Korea has evolved into a state structured around nuclear weapons and the willingness to use them. The political purges, the ICBM programme, the new nuclear doctrine, and the Russia arms deal are not separate initiatives. They are components of a strategy designed to ensure regime survival through the credible threat of catastrophic escalation.
The Russia deal has accelerated this trajectory. The estimated $1.7 billion in payments has provided Pyongyang with hard currency it cannot obtain through legal trade, given UN sanctions imposed after the 2017 nuclear tests. The satellite technology has improved North Korea's reconnaissance capabilities, reducing its reliance on imprecise intelligence and potentially lowering the threshold for preemptive action based on perceived threats.
International responses have been limited. The UN Security Council has been paralysed by Russian and Chinese vetoes of new sanctions resolutions since 2022. The last successful sanctions resolution, UNSCR 2397, passed in December 2017. Since then, Russia and China have blocked every attempt to tighten enforcement or impose new penalties, arguing that dialogue, not pressure, should be prioritised.
Humanitarian conditions inside North Korea have worsened. The World Food Programme estimates that 11 million people—42 percent of the population—are undernourished, and the regime has rejected international food aid since 2020, citing COVID-19 contamination fears. Border closures with China, maintained until late 2023, further isolated the country and devastated informal markets that many North Koreans rely on for survival.
What Comes Next
There is no clear diplomatic pathway forward. The United States has ruled out recognising North Korea as a nuclear weapons state, which Pyongyang now demands as a precondition for talks. South Korea's government, elected in 2022 on a platform of toughness toward the North, has abandoned the previous administration's engagement policies. China, once seen as North Korea's only point of leverage, has shown little interest in pressuring Kim, particularly as U.S.-China relations have deteriorated.
Military analysts now model scenarios that were once considered implausible: North Korean preemptive strikes based on misread intelligence, accidental escalation during joint U.S.-South Korean military exercises, or deliberate provocations designed to fracture the alliance. The risk is not that Kim Jong Un is irrational. It is that he has built a system where the costs of backing down exceed the costs of escalating.
In Seoul, the question is no longer whether North Korea will give up its nuclear weapons. It is whether deterrence can hold in a crisis where both sides believe the other will strike first. "We are planning for contingencies that we never had to seriously consider before," one South Korean defence official said in March, speaking on condition of anonymity. "The assumption that Pyongyang will always stop short of war—that assumption is gone."
